Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia

[edit]
Category

Category

[edit]
Misc

Misc

[edit]
Tools

Tools

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 139
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 33
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 57
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 6
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 78
Requested RD1 redactions 1
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 22
Open sockpuppet investigations 52
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]

CSD / PRODs

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 10
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 2
Other candidates 12
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 17 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

[edit]



User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Mykolas Majauskas

[edit]

Reason: There is an extremely high level of Single Purpose Account (SPA) vandalism on the page. Discussion on the talk page hasn't helped, as the SPA keeps reverting any changes, manipulating sources, and clearly violating BLP policy. The article should be extended-protected at the very least, or user should be blocked from editing it. However, given the nature of their edits, I doubt they won't create a new account to continue editing the page. 美しい歌 (talk) 10:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Alan MacMasters hoax

[edit]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism on this page about a Wikipedia hoax page, nonsense edits. IP vandalism seems to get more frequent lately, several cases per day. Chrisahn (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Lohia

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – WP:GSCASTE; surname article that was recently hijacked with low-quality caste-related content. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte

[edit]

Reason: Someone keep editing a fake info Editorialph (talk) 13:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Declined @Editorialph: you have been reverted multiple times, reasons habe been given in the edit-summaries. Protection isn't the way to go here. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
@Lectonar Requested user is now the subject of an ANI report. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Edit-warring and WP:SOAPBOX Borgenland (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Fren

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs often retarget this to Pepe the frog, since Pepe memes sometimes use the term, but that article neither uses nor explains this word at all. Belbury (talk) 13:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Soaking (sexual practice)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. C⚛smLearner 💬🔬 13:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Nettspend

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Sparkbean (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Ronahî TV

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently being targeted by sock accounts. MrOllie (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Alan Bolton (darts player)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism of changing the birthdate and changing an album link, without adding any sources. Multiple edits done by different IPs (possibly the same human). Bunnypranav (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte

[edit]

Reason: Threats by Editorialph (talk · contribs) to vandalize the article. See [2]. Borgenland (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Shooting of Chris Kaba

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Racist edits. Requesting protection. Knitsey (talk) 15:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

I attempted to request this also but Twinkle said there was an active request. For context, this is in the media at the moment due to the trial outcome. A few days of protection should be all it needs before the media cycle is over and it calms down again. -OXYLYPSE (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Graveland

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts to whitewash the article to remove sourced content, often with less than truthful edit summaries (for example removing all sources and saying it's "unsourced" or that the sources don't exist). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Ariane Tabatabai

[edit]

Reason: People with strong opinions and vandals on a BLP Polygnotus (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Guru Jambheshwar

[edit]

Reason: Persistent spamming the WP:CASTEID and changing the wikimarkup with repulsive editing while stressing the early life of historical figure 188.47.3.92 (talk) 16:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Boomerang (Latin American TV channel)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP users. Ongoing for a week now. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

John Dalton

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Bill Cipher

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Chester A. Arthur

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This Featured Article, for whatever reason, attracts vandals. Maybe it's all the same LTA but the accepted version/limited protection is wearing to deal with. They/him/her think they've succeeded so they keep coming back for their funfunFUN. Make it stop. Please. Shearonink (talk) 17:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Planetary science

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of WP:SPAM by IPs. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Canada–India diplomatic row

[edit]

Reason: Per [3] Cremastra (u — c) 01:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

@Cremastra: Even for consensus changes like this, please try to contact the protecting administrator to request unprotection first. Thanks! @Black Kite: Any objections to lifting the protection? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. Cremastra (u — c) 12:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Aaj Tak

[edit]

Reason: All editors agreed that whatever we put on this page will only be edited once everyone reviews it. AnuragBisht108 (talk) 04:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

@AnuragBisht108: Where is this consensus? I see no such agreement on Talk:Aaj Tak. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Note that the user making this request had been previously been blocked for 31 hours for edit warring and 8RR on the same subject in what some editors suspect may be a case of whitewashing and COI as noted on their talk page and in the article in question, and that they have a sockpuppet account linked to them (User:AnuBisht21) that was used to edit the article and was the very reason why this article was protected in the first place. That the reason they claim is also not supported in talk also raises questions as to user's intentions. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive Edits and Misinformation by User "Ratnahastin" on AajTak Wikipedia Page. Borgenland (talk) 13:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done There is no such consensus; the requesting editor is the reason for the page protection and should think carefully about their future involvement with the page. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
If anything, this is an argument to increase protection to extended-confirmed from semi.  Requesting immediate archiving... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Gaza genocide

[edit]

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[4] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[5][6][7].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[8]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[9] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[10] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[11]][[12]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide 2

[edit]

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[13][14] and a form of Holocaust erasure[15], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[16][17][18][19]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Template:Israel–Hamas war infobox

[edit]

Inform readers of the distinction between the dagger symbol and the cross symbol in the infobox.

Under "Commanders and leaders" in the infobox Yahya Sinwar has a dagger next to his name, but others such as Marwan Issa have a cross next to their name. The distinction between these symbols is not immediately clear to someone reading the article, I feel that this should be explicitly noted on the page. The Elysian Vector Fields (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@TheElysianVectorFields: That isn't the article page, that's the infobox template. I changed the target for you above. It seems the dagger means "killed in action" (KIA) and the cross means "assassinated". I honestly don't know how I'd add a note to that effect. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure it out. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide

[edit]

The last few sentences of the second lead paragraph regarding assassinated Hamas leaders are too detailed for the lead. I don't believe including all of their names without reason is appropriate when the Infobox can convey a simpler understanding of their demise and state. Instead, figures of utmost relevance should be accounted for with reasons outside of their killings.

My suggestion is to change this:

In January 2024, Saleh al-Arouri, the deputy political chief of Hamas, was assassinated in Beirut, Lebanon. In July, Israel claimed to have killed military leader Mohammed Deif in an airstrike in al-Mawasi. In August, Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas was assassinated in Tehran, Iran. In October, Yahya Sinwar, the chief and preceding political leader of Hamas, was killed in a shootout in Rafah.

To this:

Throughout 2024, Israel has killed many of Hamas' political and military officials. Prominent figures killed by Israel include Ismail Haniyeh and Yahya Sinwar, who have collectively served as political leaders for Hamas since 2007, and supposedly[citation for clarity] Mohammed Deif, who led Hamas' military branch, the Ezzedeen al-Qassam Brigades, since 2002.

This connects to Israel's goals described prior to this section, while establishing the impact of those killings pertaining to Hamas and Palestine as a whole. The readability of this is a bit wonky though, so if you have any better ideas, please let me know! Ecco2kstan (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

OOPS! I made a mistake in the title. This DOES NOT pertain to the Gaza Genocide article! This is about the Israel-Hamas War. Ecco2kstan (talk) 04:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

[edit]

Move Saleh al-Arouri from military to political due to him being the Deputy Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau before his death ElementalKnight987654321 (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

[edit]

Add a map key indicating what color denotes "Lebanon under Israeli control" in the legend for the map showing the "Northern Israel sector of war." It is already shown in the file and on other pages that use this file, so this edit would merely be to align with the file and the other articles. 129,743rd user (talk) 00:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

14 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (request) 2024-10-08 19:31 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-forbidden-edit (request) 2024-10-08 19:31 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Noarticletext-nopermission (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-editnotice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotice load (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice load/notext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice/notice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-02-14: "Highly visible template: and included in a high-risk template"
Template:Editnotices/Group/Template:Editnotices (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist (request) 2024-10-09 18:48 MediaWiki page (log)
Module:Gadgets (request) 2024-10-09 23:46 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Pit bull (request) 2024-10-22 16:09 Fully protected, expires 2024-10-25 at 20:47:22 UTC (log) Modified by ToBeFree on 2024-10-11: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
9 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-09-25 22:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox sportsperson (request) 2024-10-06 11:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-10-07 06:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-10-10 09:41 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:MultiReplace (request) 2024-10-17 22:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:College color (request) 2024-10-18 00:22 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2024-10-20 08:40 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Module:Political party (request) 2024-10-22 10:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2021-11-18: "High-risk template or module: 13487 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Designation/colour2 (request) 2024-10-22 11:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by Alex Shih on 2017-09-04: "Highly visible template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:W9793

[edit]
 Not done I'm afraid this recent AfD result means your articles will need keep being reviewed for the time being. – Joe (talk) 12:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Kent Wang

[edit]

I want to replace links to old photos with links to better photos Kent Wang (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm not really sure AWB is the best tool for that; images are usually only used on one or a few pages, and AWB is more for mass-changes. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

User:OpalYosutebito

[edit]

I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([20]). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Your use of AWB appears to have been removed rather than for inactivity - can you explain why or how you will use AWB within the rules and guidelines going forward? Primefac (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

User:(Oinkers42)

[edit]

I would love to use this for category maintenance and WikiProject tagging across a wide spread of articles quickly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

I believe WP:CATALOT and WP:RATER are better tools for these tasks. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Miminity

[edit]

I would like to use AWB for fixing various puntuations and citations issues found on WP:NPP and articles within my scope as sometimes it's hard to notice it. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

User:EnzoTC

[edit]

I need to add 'Flag of X District' and 'Flag of Y Region' categories to around 3,000 Slovakian flags, doing just about 5% manually took a full day. EnzoTC (talk) 04:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Spida-tarbell

[edit]

I write to request permission to use AutoWikiBrowser to facilitate identification of duplicate references; I understand that the tool only identifies exact duplicates, and that I must check every edit before saving it. spida-tarbell 𐡸 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:RachelTensions

[edit]

There are about 200 templates at Category:South Korea pop music group navigational boxes, Category:Girl group navigational boxes, and Category:Boy band navigational boxes that are members of content categories and shouldn't be per the guideline at WP:CAT#T. Hoping to automate their removal. RachelTensions (talk) 02:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([21]). — MusikBot talk 02:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Gladcape2013

[edit]

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights I need to help I make good edits that are very good I help revert vandalism Gladcape2013 (talk) 20:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Jlwoodwa

[edit]
petscan:29601810 shows several hundred biographies with inconsistent categories. Depending on the subject, the solution is either replacing Category:Year of birth missing (living people) with Category:Year of birth missing, or adding Category:Living people. It's very repetitive (even with HotCat), but I don't think a bot could reliably decide which solution to apply. I'm requesting AWB access because it seems like the right kind of semi-automated tool for this job. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Bramnickatriot

[edit]

Hello, I have another account that is semi-confirmed, I have this account mainly for image uploading, and I need to edit some semi-confirmed articles to update the images. Bramnickatriot (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

@Bramnickatriot what other account? Please use that account to post a reply here, so we can confirm that it's you. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
User:12.47563.OH Bramnickatriot (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
@Bramnickatriot can you please confirm from that account that you are the same person? Also, you should disclose your alternative accounts on your userpage. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
@Elli I can confirm I am the same in both accounts. 12.47563.OH (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 18:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Ujjwal Sharma (India)

[edit]

Been Editing and contributing for 3 years and may have significantly less edits but have 274 contributions of perfect quality and now will be engaging myself more in Wikipedia. Thankyou theusualhuman (talk) 07:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done User:Ujjwal Sharma (India)] has no edits to the English Wikipedia that have not been deleted. Donald Albury 14:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
They appear to have changed their name while this was pending, but I'm only seeing like five live edits and maybe twenty deleted ones, so way short of enough to even consider granting this early. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 20:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Royiswariii

[edit]

Hi! I'm applying again as a reviewer, my last time apply on this new page reviwer was declined because my account wasn't 90 days and doesn't meet 500 mainspace edits and i have a contest article deletion. Now it was meet my criteria of 90 days (which is 91 days now i think), 500 mainspace edits and the article was I mentioned it was my article Namumula and the decision is to keep. I created 7 articles (one of my article was approved using AfC), 2 disambiguation and some redirects. I want to participate because i want to share my knowledge and to experience this, and to help lessen the backlogs and delete some unnecessary articles. Royiswariii | D-GENERATION X | u can talk me :) 06:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([22]). — MusikBot talk 06:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process to feel comfortable granting you the permission at this point in time. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Hey man im josh, when can I reapply again? Royiswariii | D-GENERATION X | u can talk me :) 05:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
3 months might be a good waiting period. If you apply too soon after a rejection, it may not demonstrate to the WP:PERM admins that you've had enough time to learn and calibrate to previous feedback. Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Please also reconsider how you tag articles that need work - this is really excessive. If you drop this many tags on something you find in the NPP queue you're going to drive people crazy. -- asilvering (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey, Asilvering!
I see you reverted some speedy deletion, The two speedy deletion - this and this. The two are already existed in the main article (Maki (singer) and My Mother, My Story), that's why i flagged as speedy deletion. Would you mind to revert it because it's abandoned and it's existing in the wikipedia article. Royiswariii | D-GENERATION X | u can talk me :) 07:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
@Royiswariii: Technically whenever, but moving too quick is unnecessary. I understand you want to help and you're eager to do so, but there's no reason to rush it. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
@Royiswariii, both of those are incorrect CSD tags. Please read the guidelines at WP:CSD very carefully before tagging any more articles. -- asilvering (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

User:TheBirdsShedTears

[edit]

I'd like to request NPR rights. I have prior experience with AfC and NPP, so I'm familiar with the process of reviewing new pages. I'm confident in my understanding of notability guidelines and can easily spot paid/COI editing, as well as unreliable and branded sources. I am also familiar with WP:DP, WP:NOBITING, and CSD

I understand the importance of careful, fair reviews and will do my best to uphold the quality of content on Wikipedia. Thank you! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

not done, this does not address the removal of your permissions last year under suspicion of UPE. signed, Rosguill talk 14:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Switching to  On hold so that this doesn't get archived mid-discussion signed, Rosguill talk 18:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
@Rosguill: My account was compromised and i have never been engaged in paid editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
You are expected to be upfront about prior permissions changes and to address these concerns in your initial request. This is now the third time (2, 1) that you have requested permissions since then without addressing this concern in your initial request. That you did not do so does not inspire confidence. You also have not clarified what steps you have taken to prevent your account from being compromised again, which is a necessity before you are conferred any advanced permissions. signed, Rosguill talk 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the chance to explain. I realize I should have addressed this in my initial request, and I'm sorry for not doing so. When my account was compromised, it resulted in my permissions being revoked. I want to be clear that I've never been involved in paid editing.
Since then, I've taken steps to secure my account, including enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) on my registered email, setting a strong password for my account, occasionally changing my password, and regularly checking my account activity to prevent any future issues. I understand how serious this is and am fully committed to keeping my account secure going forward.
I'm really keen to contribute positively to Wikipedia again and will approach NPP and other responsibilities with full accountability. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Can you please also give a timeline of what happened? How many weeks was your account compromised for? What date was it compromised and what date was the compromise stopped? How bad was the damage when it was compromised? What kind of edits did the attackers make? Any idea how it was compromised in the first place? I understand this is a lot of detail to ask, but explaining exactly what happened should be helpful here. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Due to my health concerns, as noted here, I was inactive on the site. I gradually recovered, as mentioned here. However, in June 2022, I experienced health issues again, and this time, I didn’t inform the administrators because I had completely stopped using digital devices. As a result of this inactivity, I wasn't able to monitor my account or review my activity on the site. During this time, when my account was compromised, it was used solely for promotional editing by the attacker. Around 15 days before my account was blocked, I noticed I couldn't reset my password because the attacker had hijacked my email and removed it from my Wikipedia account. I recovered my email soon after realizing it was hacked. Upon reviewing my account activity, I found it in a dire state, used solely for promotional editing, which not only damaged Wikipedia but also hurt the trust I had built over several years of hardwork. I also noticed that the account had been inactive after the attacker created 4 articles between May 2023 and July 2023. I was exploring possible ways to regain access. Since I had previously contacted Materialscientist, I emailed them again (as noted here) in August 2023 to confirm my identity and that my email was the original registered email. However, it seemed they were not available. I then contacted the steward team, who directed me to email ca(at)wikimedia.org. After a series of emails, they video-called me, asked some questions, and eventually restored my account on 16 September 2024. Compromise stopped since i regained access in September 2024 and i took necessary steps to secure my Wikipedia account as well as email address. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for those details. Sorry to hear about your health problems. I hope you're doing a lot better now.
1) So your account was compromised from June 2022 to September 2023 (1 year 3 months)? When we take a look at those edits we should assume those are the attacker?
2) Any idea how your account got compromised? They somehow broke into your email and from there used that to password reset your Wikipedia account and got access to it that way? I guess that means that a) you were specifically targeted by UPEs since random hackers would not know or care about your Wikipedia NPP perm and b) they somehow had your email address? Do you remember any phishing attacks against your email or anything like that? –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
My account was compromised from May 2023 until it was blocked in August 2023, preventing further edits to the mainspace (actual compromise date is not known since i was inactive and under medical observation). The compromise ended when I regained access in September 2024. Any edits made between May and July 2023 were not mine but were done by the attacker. I'm unsure how they accessed my email, but I suspect it occurred after I clicked on a free mobile phone giveaway link shared in a local job offer WhatsApp group (which I have since exited). I downloaded a zip file containing a PDF, unaware that links from untrusted or unknown sources could compromise personal data. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

User:OnlyNano

[edit]

I recently completed my 90 day trial period, and have been successful with my new page reviews. I am looking to renew so I may continue my work with reviewing. OnlyNanotalk 14:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Elli (expires 00:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 14:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
 Done, track record looks good. signed, Rosguill talk 14:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

User:UzbukUdash

[edit]

Hello there, Im contributing to wiki nearly a decade; my edit count is near 600. From the last two months, I've been actively contributing or trying to. Can I be considered a reviewer? Thanks! UzbukUdash (talk) 17:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 378 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 17:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Nuvolet

[edit]

I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)

A reasonable number of moves, but I not seeing any WP:RM/TR requests and am concerned by this RM which – based on the previous RM – seemed doomed to fail in the first place. This discussion also looks to be going against you. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
I only can say I'll be responsible if you grant me this right. I can participate in more TM, I just need to get usedd.to them. Yes it failed however I understood the norms and moved similar articles to Countryname. I opposed to Anatolian plateau because there are other geographical units that use capitalization in similar contexts. — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 01:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:DM5Pedia

[edit]

I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

[edit]

Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Legendbird. Thanks for your enthusiasm. The good news is: you can already revert obvious vandalism! If you'd like to help out, you can go to Special:RecentChanges and revert obvious vandalism. There are a few tools you can install, like Wikipedia:Twinkle to make this easier, and automatically warn vandals too. I'd be happy to grant you PCR once you've gained some experience with these tools. For now, I can't see a track record yet to see if you've understood vandalism enough, so I'll be marking this as  Not done. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
I have read all the internal WP: articles on vandalism, and have Lupin's Anti-Vandal tool installed, however, I am asking for PRC, as every time I check "filter recent changes", there are none. Wikipedia being too good at its job, I guess. I'll keep an eye out more on the "filter recent changes" page, I guess. Thanks! Legendbird (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Cactinites

[edit]

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Gonzafer001

[edit]

To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Yovt

[edit]

I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I have been active on Wikipedia for a while, focusing on improving content quality and helping maintain the integrity of articles. I am not new to reviewing edits, as I use edit-request tools to answer several requests by unregistered/registered editors that wish to see changes on several articles. I have read all policies on how to handle this right and know the responsibly that comes alongside it. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Imconfused3456

[edit]

I like helping out and reviewing recent changes, and I would like to be able to contribute further by receiving pending changes reviewer rights. Imconfused3456talk 01:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

User:BittersweetParadox

[edit]

I would like to help contribute to the Wikipedia community and help reviews happen quicker. I am passionate about unbiased true information being presented and I think this would be a good privilege for me. BittersweetParadox (talk) 07:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

User:RangersRus

[edit]
I have been reviewing changes on many pages made by editors and IPs and helped by improving and protecting pages from vandalism. My editing history will prove that I am very capable and can be great help. I did set aside time and read and understood guidelines for vandalism, Reviewing pending changes and Protection policies before submitting this request. RangersRus (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TheWikiToby

[edit]

(Trying this again because one of my scripts broke the template)

I have been reverting vandalism and patrolling recent changes for over a month now. The last time my request was declined, I simply hadn't been patrolling for a month at that point, and @Fastily had no other objections. I have consistently warned all vandals I reverted and reported many to AIV. I believe I'm ready to have rollback now. Also note that I am a pending changes reviewer. TheWikiToby (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([23]). — MusikBot talk 17:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 23:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Diff by diff:
1. Completely forgot that there is a warning template for NOTFORUM. The last time I used that warning was all the way on Sept 13 [24] which is more than a month ago. Completely skipped my mind.
2. I have no explanation on this one; I probably just forgot.
3. No explanation either.
The earlier failures seem to be one off mistakes I made that happen to be close together, but the revert that happened just today is definitely very unfortunate for me not to warn. The sea of reverts I've made mostly have warnings other than the above, so I don't exactly know how I managed to forget to warn at all. I'll make sure this doesn't happen again. TheWikiToby (talk) 01:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Yes. I promise a warning/explanation for every revert I perform from now on. TheWikiToby (talk) 21:58, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

User:MolecularPilot

[edit]

Hi! I've been RC patrolling for a month combined and have the needed mainspace edits.

I always warn users when reverting their edits, either with the default warning template or a custom one if the situation is unique.

I think I understand the policies here, as all of my reports to WP:AIV, WP:RPP and WP:UAA have resulted in action.

I would like Rollback because using more advanced tools like Huggle would make my RC patrolling easier.

Thanks for your time! MolecularPilot 08:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

User:RangersRus

[edit]
I have been policing many pages and have reverted many vandalism by IPs and disruptive editors and added warnings on talk pages of the users. I have done this for a while now. I have also reported on ANI about vandalism. Rollback rights will make it more easier to help with vandalism and I am ready to accept this role. RangersRus (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 143
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 22
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 6

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 511
    Templates for deletion 52
    Categories for deletion 118
    Wikipedia files for discussion 22
    All redirects for discussion 316
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 3
    Possible copyright violations 25
    All articles proposed for deletion 223
    All files proposed for deletion 37
    Unsorted AfD debates 1
    All files with the same name on Commons 4
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 427
    Unknown copyright status 30
    Unknown source 24
    No non-free use rationale 2
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 8

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,243
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 441
    Protected against vandalism 5
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,389
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,386 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 5,957 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,321 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 39,346 0.57

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,051 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 530,231 7.68
    All articles lacking sources 81,192 1.18
    All unreferenced BLPs 716 0.06
    All articles needing additional references 467,091 6.77
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,600 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,779 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 311,609 4.52

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 145 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 17 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,475 0.02
    All articles to be split 808 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 2 -
    Stub categories 19,245 -
    All uncategorized pages 979 0.01
    All orphaned articles 53,757 0.78
    All articles needing copy edit 2,646 0.04
    All articles with style issues 19,400 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,759 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,548 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 435
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,619
    All accuracy disputes 15,748
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 6
    All articles to be expanded 66,188

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Winhunter&oldid=1190483781"